“truly gifted and supremely able”
“has notable strength across all areas of commercial chancery work”
“he assures judges that he is right”
Hermann Boeddinghaus has over 20 years’ experience as a specialist in corporate and commercial disputes and insolvency law. He enjoys a busy litigation caseload, spread between the Chancery Division, the Commercial Court and international arbitration tribunals. Many of his cases have an international or offshore element, and he is a member of the Bar of the Eastern Carribean Supreme Court (British Virgin Islands). Alongside this he has developed a substantial advisory practice.
Hermann has represented Nigeria and Pakistan in major asset recovery claims against the families and associates of former rulers. Other clients have ranged from the world’s largest banks to small family firms and individual entrepreneurs. He has built a reputation as a tough and persuasive advocate, much liked by his clients.
Hermann is adept at getting to grips with matters of a highly technical nature. His particular interest is in complex financial fraud; but he is equally at home in handling high value commercial arbitrations (construction, leisure, oil & gas, shipping). He has a strong academic background in science as well as law. Clients have repeatedly praised him for his rigorous attention to detail, tempered by a pragmatic, user-friendly approach.
- What the directories and judges say
For over 10 years, Hermann has been recommended as a leading junior in both of the principal legal directories, where he has been described (among other things) as “extremely user-friendly; thorough, with an excellent grasp of complex detail” (the Legal 500), “intellectually very strong” (the Legal 500), “highly rated” (Chambers & Partners) and as having a “low-key, but tough and intellectually rigorous style … very much to the liking of his clients” (Chambers & Partners).
In the most recent editions, he is described as being “extremely responsive”, as offering “well-thought-out advice, which is both strongly analytical and commercially focused”, and as “a determined advocate [who] has a good gauge of how to approach issues in terms of winning favour with judges” (Chambers UK Bar 2018). In the Legal 500 UK 2017, he is particularly recommended for high-profile shareholder disputes.
- Cases of interest
- Re Tiso Blackstar Holdings plc  (cross-border merger; formation of a Societas Europaea by scheme of arrangement);
- Janus Capital Management LLC v Safeguard World International Ltd  (breach of fiduciary duties);
- LCIA arbitration concerning the control of a leading online retailer ;
- Aabar Block Sarl v Maud  (abuse of process: use of insolvency proceedings as an instrument in competitive commercial conduct);
- Energenics Holdings Pte Ltd v Hazarika and others  (directors’ duties);
- Re Casa Estates (UK) Limited  (CA) (meaning of balance sheet and cash flow insolvency);
- Re Michael Bernard McNamara  (suspension from discharge in one of the largest bankruptcies in English legal history);
- LCIA arbitration (jurisdiction dispute) for a major Japanese shipbuilding & engineering group concerning West African oil & gas industry ;
- Three LMAA arbitrations valued at US$100m concerning three bulk carrier newbuilds on behalf of German owners, against a Chinese shipyard ;
- Kreissparkasse Esslingen-Nürtingen v Willi Balz and another  (€400m asset recovery exercise; freezing orders and ancillary relief);
- Seward (Wessex) Limited (in Administration) v Saunders and others  (claims against directors);
- Norbrook Laboratories Ltd and Lord Ballyedmond v Carr and others  (unincorporated associations; legal professional privilege);
- ICC arbitration arising out of a North Sea oil & gas production facility contract (the first case in which an emergency arbitrator was appointed under the new (2012) ICC Emergency Arbitrator Rules) ;
- Re MK Airlines Ltd  (liquidator’s remuneration and expenses; disclaimer; insolvency set-off; priorities under statutory charges);
- W v T  (Commercial Court application pending arbitral proceedings: conditions for an order for cross-examination following freezing order);
- Re Weston Group plc  (minority shareholder’s petition; company valuation; minority shareholder discount);
- Energenics Holdings Pte Ltd v Hazarika and others  (injunctive relief against respondent outside the jurisdiction against whom no cause of action asserted);
- Re Hollier (Carman v Letchford)  (CA) (transactions at an undervalue & preference payments);
- P v H  (business valuation of major hotel business; Commercial Court challenge of arbitration award on grounds of serious irregularity or bias);
- Cadogan Petroleum plc v Tolley and others  (fraud, conspiracy, constructive trust and dishonest assistance claims arising out of alleged bribes);
- Willets v Alvey and others  (variation of freezing order – change of circumstances);
- Re Knightsbridge Property Management Limited  (competing winding up and administration petitions);
- Validus Holdings Ltd v IPC Holdings Ltd  (Bermuda hostile takeover bid; contentious company scheme of arrangement);
- Re Oceanrose Investments Limited  (cross-border merger; members’ meetings);
- Cooper v PRG Powerhouse Ltd  (ability to consolidate bank accounts for tracing purposes; Quistclose-type trust);
- Expandable Ltd and another v Rubin  (CA) (reference to documents in evidence no automatic waiver of legal professional privilege);
- Lee v Osborne and others  (takeover; duties of independent directors; breach of City Code constituting illegality and barring claim to relief);
- Demick (Shipping) Limited v Gerald Edelman and others  (administrators’ personal liability for expenses; scope of administrators’ immunity against claim for conversion; effect of retention of title provisions in an administration);
- Re Transocean Equipment Manufacturing and Trading Ltd  (majority creditors exercising voting powers for collateral purposes; Court’s jurisdiction to restrain the removal of a liquidator);
- Re Paradise Bet Limited  (minority shareholder’s petition; requirements for an effective O’Neill v Phillips offer);
- Re Transocean Equipment Manufacturing and Trading Ltd  (directors’ duties; pooling scheme of arrangement between companies in liquidation; fraudulent trading);
- Flüshöh GmbH & Co KG v Ford Motor Company  (insolvency set-off);
- Re Yates  (transactions defrauding creditors);
- Joint Liquidators of BCCI v Bank of America  (multi $billion fraudulent trading claim);
- Republic of Pakistan v Zardari and others  (tracing);
- Federal Republic of Nigeria v Abacha and others  (general asset recovery; third party asset disclosure orders);
- MRW Technologies Limited v Charter plc  (contested M&A transaction; civil procedure);
- Re EuroFinance Group Limited  (minority shareholder’s petition);
- UPC v Deutsche Bank AG  (investment banker’s fiduciary duties; whether breach of confidence by investment banker giving rise to proprietary claims);
- Re Philip Alexander Securities & Futures Ltd  (creditors meetings; voting by proxy; court imposition of terms into an agreement for voluntary liquidation).
Contributing author to OUP’s Annotated Companies Acts.
Contributing author to OUP’s Annotated Companies Legislation.
Contributing author to Butterworths Practical Insolvency.
German and French.
- Career & appointments
Qualified as a solicitor in September 1996 (with Slaughter and May).
Called to the Bar of England and Wales in November 1996.
Called to the Bar of the Eastern Carribean Supreme Court (British Virgin Islands) in October 2017.
Member of the Chancery Bar Association, COMBAR, and the British South African Law Association.
- Education & awards
Hermann was educated at the Universities of Cape Town (BSc in Medicine) and Bonn and at Magdalen College, Oxford (MA Jurisprudence, BCL).
In his final year at Oxford Hermann became a member of the Studienstiftung des deutschen Volkes, Germany’s most prestigious scholarship foundation. He stayed on to teach, as a tutor in Contract Law and Tort at Wadham College, Oxford, and at the same time trained as a solicitor with Slaughter and May. Later, he became a Kennedy Scholar of Lincoln’s Inn.