
As a leading Chambers in the Middle East, we are sponsors of the forthcoming Legal 500 Disputes Summit Middle East 2022.
Chambers is delighted to announce that Lara Hassell-Hart and Daniel Kessler have both been appointed to the Attorney General’s ‘C’ Panel of Junior Counsel to the Crown. Their appointment commences on 1 September 2022. Lara and Daniel join Nicholas Cox, Tiran Nersessian and Alex Cook (A Panel) and Albert Sampson (C Panel) who are all
George Bompas QC and Sarah Harman represented a boutique city firm of solicitors when they obtained a final judgment in a long-running legal battle with a retired partner. In this judgment the High Court concluded that the partners’ accounts were not defective so as to give the retired partner a claim for unpaid profit share.
We are delighted to announce that Sophy Tuck has accepted an offer of tenancy and will join chambers as a tenant from 25/07/22 following successful completion of her pupillage. Sophy accepts instructions in all of chambers’ practice areas, including: banking and finance; commercial dispute resolution; civil fraud; company law; and insolvency and restructuring. Congratulations Sophy and
Today, Andrew Clutterbuck QC is speaking at R3 Association of Business Recovery Professionals on the topic of “Mega claims: How insolvency practitioners conduct gargantuan litigation”. This will involve a Q&A on the tactics and best practice in getting large insolvency claims up and running and to trial with a focus on information flow, team building and
Clerk of the year – Ben Lashmar, Junior of the year – Tiran Nersessian, Set of the year – 4 Stone Buildings, Silk of the year – Orlando Fraser KC, Chancery set of the year – 4 Stone Buildings, Chancery Silk of the year – Jonathan Crow KC, Commercial litigation junior of the year – Chris Harrison, Financial Crime junior
At an expedited application hearing Falk J made an interim mandatory injunction for the provision of documents concerning receivables which comprise the securitised assets in three securitisations. The applicant’s case was that it had a contractual right to be provided with the documents because it needed them to comply with its regulatory obligations to value